Most Holy Eucharist Foundation F/k/a Missionaries Most Holy Euch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208406330
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 6025022024
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $241,830
- Expenses
- $242,248
- Assets
- $2,529,320
- Liabilities
- $50,016
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FR DECLAN GIBSON (PRESIDENT/TR)
Highest reported compensation
- FR DECLAN GIBSON (PRESIDENT/TR): $23,033 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Form 990, part iii, primary exempt purpose - supporting eucharistic causes and priests who are devoted to establishing perpetual eucharistic adoration and renewing eucharistic adoration in parishes, silent retreats, eucharistic day retreats, and eucharistic pilgrimages. Form 990 , part v, information regarding personal benefit contracts: the organization did not during the year, receive any funds, directly, or indirectly to pay premiums on a personal benefit contract. The organization did not during the year pay any premiums, directly, or indirectly on a personal benefit contract.
What it reported doing in 2025
Supporting eucharistic causes and priests who are devoted to setting up eucharistic adoration in parishes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.44; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 48.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 44.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $240K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $23K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.