Moses Taylor Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
240795461
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Scranton, PA, USA
Phone
7179632299
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$74,998,113
Expenses
$68,365,087
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Moses taylor hospital will provide continuously improving quality and cost effective health care that is customer and community focused.

What it reported doing in 2011

Moses taylor hospital is a 226-bed community hospital located in scranton, pa. The hospital offers a broad range of services including acute medical and surgical services, a 22-bed senior medical mental health unit, a 14-bed inpatient rehabilitation unit, a 26-bed obstetrics unit, and a 15-bed neonatal intensive care unit. In addition, outpatient programming includes 24 hour emergency services, medical clinics, and ambulatory surgery services. The hospital also operates a diabetic treatment center.adult, pediatrics, obstetrics/medical surgical services 24,844 dayslaboratory services 320,210 lab testsradiological diagnostics 16,371 x-rays, c.t. Scans & mrisemergency & outpatient clinic services 16,057 er & clinic services

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 68
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -31.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -77% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 6 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $436K · 19 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.