Mosaic Vermont Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222600063
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Montpelier, VT, USA
Phone
8024761388
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rape Victim Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$691,479
Expenses
$773,207
Assets
$609,846
Liabilities
$42,997

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JENELLE ALVIN (DIRECTOR)
  • NORA LOVELETTE (DIRECTOR)
  • SARAH MASON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mosaic Vermont's mission is to heal communities and end sexual violence.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education, training and youth empowerment: education is central to our work. This year, we embraced the joy and humor that come with teaching youth. Through playful activities and open conversations about sex and bodies, we created spaces where young people felt safe asking awkward, important questions-and left feeling more confident and informed. We also worked with caregivers, educators, and workplaces to build understanding of trauma, healthy relationships, and the role everyone plays in shifting culture. Our trainings helped people recognize harm, respond with care, and foster supportive environments where everyone feels safe, seen, and supported-even when harm occurs. Whether in classrooms or workplaces, we sparked honest conversations, explored culture, and problem-solved together. By blending joy, honesty, and care, we created spaces where learning thrives and resilience grows- building lasting change through education that connects and empowers. Our youth empowerment work remained rooted in affirming young people's leadership, curiosity, and capacity to create change. Their ideas and actions reminded us that prevention doesn't live in a silo; it lives in the bold, everyday choices young people make when they are supported, believed in, and heard. More than 1,900 youth from 12 schools participated in prevention programming. Eight student leaders from different schools worked together on violence prevention in their schools, and 50 students across Washington county participated in sexual violence prevention and awareness clubs. Empowerment programming included take back the night planning committee, a youth peer advocacy program training, a bipoc youth group, and a club called, "the conversation," centered around creating a culture of consent within the school community. We also offered classroom education around consent, healthy relationships, boundaries, and sexual health-from early childhood through high school. Programs like let's talk sex, and mattering and belonging helped youth to understand their bodies, communicate clearly, and build strong connections.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 83% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $740K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.