Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510502943
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025572700
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,280,224
- Expenses
- $3,665,181
- Assets
- $3,866,989
- Liabilities
- $1,444,171
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD J HILL (ACTING MISMO PRESIDENT)
- DAVID A COLEMAN (FORMER MISMO PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL W BRIGGS (MISMO SECRETARY): $436,612 total reported compensation
- RICHARD J HILL (ACTING MISMO PRESIDENT): $310,202 total reported compensation
- DAVID A COLEMAN (FORMER MISMO PRESIDENT): $294,216 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To drive standardized data and information and improved business practices between all mortgage stakeholders through collaborative and innovative initiatives that improve efficiency, reduce costs and facilitate stakeholder success.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mismo is the standards development organization for the mortgage industry and is the central point for collaboration among lenders, servicers, regulators, government agencies, insuring and guaranteeing agencies, government sponsored enterprises (gses), and technology providers. Mismo was established in 1999 and became a not-for-profit subsidiary of the mortgage bankers association (mba) in 2004. Mismo developed a common language for exchanging information for the mortgage finance industry. Every residential loan manufactured in the us utilizes mismo standards. Mismo standards are accepted and deployed by every type of entity involved in creating mortgages, and they are required by most regulators, housing agencies and the gses that participate in the industry. Use of mismo standards improves efficiency and reduces costs, enhances the seamless exchange of data, system, and technology platforms, and accelerates the industry's digital transformation. Mismo standards benefit lenders of every size and business model. Mismo has the unique ability to convene industry partners to solve key business challenges. Through mismo industry participants have a seat at the table to work collaboratively with industry players from across the mortgage ecosystem including the gses and government housing agencies and their regulators to develop standards that solve business, operational, and technological challenges.mismo standards are grounded in an open process to develop, promote and maintain voluntary consensus-based standards that allow participants in the mortgage industry such as mortgage lenders, investors in real estate and mortgages, servicers, industry vendors, borrowers and other parties to exchange information and more securely, efficiently and economically.mismo members pay annual dues on a calendar year basis. Some organizations participate as mismo champions, a higher level of membership that comes with additional benefits. In fy25 mismo maintained its focus on enabling key industry implementation and technology initiatives. Details of some of the many initiatives completed or in process are noted below.mismo published the common confidence score standard and related implementation guidance to establish a consistent framework for communicating and evaluating the reliability of avm-generated property valuations. The standard promotes transparency, supports risk-based decision-making and regulatory compliance efforts, and encourages broader adoption of automated valuation technologies throughout the mortgage lifecycle.mismo, in collaboration with the conference of state bank supervisors (csbs), published the mortgage compliance dataset (mcd) to establish a standardized loan data framework for regulatory examinations and loan portfolio reviews. The standard promotes consistency in the exchange of mortgage information among regulators and industry participants and supports lenders' quality control, testing, and compliance activities throughout the loan origination and post-closing lifecycle.mismo published the appraisal procurement dataset specification to standardize the ordering and procurement of appraisal and other property valuation services across the mortgage industry. The specification provides a common framework for exchanging valuation order information, improving interoperability, reducing operational complexity, and supporting the industry's transition to more efficient, data-driven valuation processes.mismo developed a new standard applying smart doc v3 verifiable profile functionality to security instruments to improve the integrity, reliability, and authenticity of mortgage loan data exchanged among industry participants. The standard enables embedded document data to be automatically verified against the associated document image, reducing manual verification efforts, enhancing data quality, and supporting more secure and efficient mortgage document processing.mismo developed the smart doc v3 eheloc specification to supp
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $437K · 33 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $955K reported
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.