Morongo Basin Mental Health Services Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 952762200
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Joshua Tree, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7609749079
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,466
- Expenses
- $437,500
- Assets
- $1,339,935
- Liabilities
- $742,801
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK LUNDQUIST (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BEVERLY ARY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- BEVERLY ARY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $115,031 total reported compensation
- DEBORAH ANDERSON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $88,391 total reported compensation
- SARAH RUSHBROOK (CLINICAL DIRECTOR): $64,369 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The
What it reported doing in 2013
The Organization ceased operations at the close of the fiscal year 2013 due to the cancellation/termination of certain major federal and/or county grants. As of July 1, 2013, most of the employees had been terminated. Also in July 2013, the Organization surrendered occupancy of their main office at Yucca Valley to move to their own residential property at Joshua Tree to minimize the cost of their closing operations. The winding up and dissolution process will continue and likely be complete by the latter part of 2014 pending final approval by the appropriate oversight agency and resolution of related business issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6,666.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.06; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 71.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -47.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.