Morehead State University Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311003236
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Morehead, KY, USA
- Phone
- 6067832599
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,815,744
- Expenses
- $6,752,177
- Assets
- $91,976,128
- Liabilities
- $12,577,591
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MR RICK HESTERBERG (FOUNDATION, CEO (PARTIAL YEAR))
- MS ALLISON CAUDILL (FOUNDATION, CEO (PARTIAL YEAR))
People named in this filing
- MR RICK HESTERBERG (FOUNDATION, CEO (PARTIAL YEAR))
- MS ALLISON CAUDILL (FOUNDATION, CEO (PARTIAL YEAR))
- MR PERRY ALLEN (BOARD CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide margin of excellence opportunity funding to morehead state university in an effort to assist msu in reaching its established goals. The mission of morehead foundation is to prudently administer all assets of the foundation and/or morehead state university as provided by federal and state law and regulation and through fiduciary responsibility between the university and the foundation, to promote educational purposes in connection with or at the request of the university by encouraging, sponsoring and supporting institutional priorities, to provide advice, consultation and support to the president and the board of regents of morehead state university, and to provide volunteer leadership to morehead state university's fund raising programs and to assist other institutional advancement efforts.
What it reported doing in 2024
Endowment fund - provided support to morehead state university for professorships, chairs, and research projects.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 86.1%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.3%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.62; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 86.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 26 of 26 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 29 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.