More Than a Game
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272164949
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Payson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 9257086427
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,400
- Expenses
- $31,089
- Assets
- $2,863
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marshall Murray (CEO)
- Donald Gieseke (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Marshall Murray (CEO)
- Donald Gieseke (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Non-profit organization with focus on excellence in athletics and leadership in one's community through service. As coaches and mentors to student athletes, we strive to provide a memorable experience. Everything we do and accomplish we are committed in serving the community and providing opportunities for others that will shape their lives in a positive way. We believe sport can teach people many aspects of life and can unite people locally and throughout the world, making it "More Than A Game"
What it reported doing in 2024
MTAG: Help communities locally and around the world to see their potential by empowering individuals to take action by using the game of baseball. No new program service projects were done in 2023 as we were positioning ourselves for 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -40.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.