Moorcroft Conservation Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
854080575
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wellington, FL, USA
Phone
5613464488
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Land Resources Conservation

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,489
Expenses
$14,424
Assets
$36,300
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLES MOORCROFT (PRESIDENT)
  • GEOFF TEALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • CHARLES MOORCROFT (PRESIDENT)
  • LOUISE SERIO (DIRECTOR)
  • GEOFF TEALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to introduce children and adults to important conservation, rescue and rehabilitation issues, inspire them to make a difference, and raise funds to support ollaborative organizations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Accomplished the exempt purpose by using charlie moorcrofts own private collection of critically endangered and protected species of animals, along with other related exhibits, the moorcroft conservation foundation provides an intimate, hands-on experience for children and adults as an introduction to important conservation, rescue and rehabilitation issues. The foundation also uses field trips to other local facilities, informational videos, related literature and occasional guest speakers to further educate their visitors on additional local, national and global conservation issues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.7%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 73.6%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.52; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -32% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -39.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.7% of revenue deployed · 73.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.