Montoursville High School Music Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920909181
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Montoursville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172013033
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,340
- Expenses
- $20,739
- Assets
- $27,911
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMANDA WITMER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AMANDA WITMER (PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN RAVERT (VICE PRESIDE)
- ELIZABETH HITTLE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The montoursville high school music boosters is a group of individuals who work together to encourage, enrich and support the music program of students involved with the montoursville area high school music department.
What it reported doing in 2024
Trips - the organization plans to subsidize a portion of the cost of future eduction trips that the band and choir will attend. The trip during the 2024 fiscal year was to cleveland, oh to visit and perform at the rock 'n roll hall of fame and cedar point amusement park (among other activities). Subsidizing this trip benefitted all band, choir and colorguard students that choose to attend (approximately 70 students).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 57.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 71% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.