Montgomery Youth Hockey Assoc C/o Pb Consulting Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521035424
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Potomac, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3019834157
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Winter Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,180,377
- Expenses
- $3,194,114
- Assets
- $3,689,125
- Liabilities
- $1,883,598
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HARRIS VEDERMAN (PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT WEISS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BOB SENKO (VICE - PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT WEISS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $86,692 total reported compensation
- ROB KEEGAN (DIRECTOR OF HOCKEY OPERATIONS): $80,804 total reported compensation
- GARY ROSENFELD (TREASURER/HOUSE COMMISSIONER): $6,885 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Myha is a volunteer driven youth hockey club providing ice hockey training, and competitive play to its members. Myha organizes teams for its own intramural league. Select teams are organized to participate against other youth ...see continuation on schedule ocontinued from page 2... Hockey clubs in the mid-atlantic region. Participants range from five to seventeen years of age.
What it reported doing in 2024
House program: these programs provide member players with the opportunity to form teams that compete on an intramural basis. Approximately 640 participants during regular season.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.