Montgomery County Free Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271198512
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Crawfordsville, IN, USA
- Phone
- 7653623244
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $302,118
- Expenses
- $327,255
- Assets
- $1,177,642
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NAOMI HORTON (PRESIDENT)
- SUZANNE THOMPSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ASHLEY MENARD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ASHLEY MENARD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $38,574 total reported compensation
- DAVID JOHNSON (PAST EXEC DIRECTOR): $36,360 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Montgomery county free clinic, inc. Offers high-quality medical and dental care and health promotion and disease prevention services to residents of montgomery county who lack insurance and would otherwise go without basic health care. To this end, the clinic is staffed by volunteer health care professionals and community members who donate their time and talents to improve the quality of their own lives while also improving the health of their community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Montgomery county free clinic, inc. Also operates as the meals on wheels crawfordsville. Meals on wheels provides physician prescribed, home-delivered meals to older adults and other home-bound persons unable to prepare adequate meals due to illness, disability or age. The organization's meals on wheels program is not affiliated with the national organization, and receives no state or federal funding. The organization relies solely on recipients covering the cost of the meals and individual donors who supplement the costs for those who cannot afford the meals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.6; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $259K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $39K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.