Montessori Village Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834301335
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- McDonough, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6787823451
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $237,243
- Expenses
- $202,970
- Assets
- $62,097
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Arlette Crump (Head of School): $34,100 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To ignite the unique potential of each child by cultivating his/her inherent love of learning through personal interests, individualized instruction and community collaboration.
What it reported doing in 2021
The core Montessori elementary curriculum meets all state and federal standards and includes mathematics, language arts, practical life skills, cultural stidues e.g., history, geography, etc, geometry, and science. Children work through all curriculum requirements at their own pace by following individualized weekly work plans. In addition, upper elementary children go on multiple field trips every year. Field trips are considered an extension of the classroom and helps to expand the classroom into a real world setting.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.9%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 71.2%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.9% of revenue deployed · 71.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $144K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $34K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.