Montessori American Indian Childcare Center Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814526053
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Roseville, MN, USA
Phone
6514781189
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$986,916
Expenses
$1,034,972
Assets
$1,354,792
Liabilities
$252,448

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Janice LaFloe (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Janice LaFloe (Executive Director): $74,741 total reported compensation
  • Lavon Lee (Leadership Guide): $51,353 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Montessori American Indian Childcare Center is to address the early childhood needs and the academic achievement gap of American Indian children, through revitalizing language and culture.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Montessori American Indian Childcare Center provides direct care for children ages 3-6 years old as a Rule Three Licensed Childcare Center in the state of MN. As such, the Montessori American Indian Childcare Center charges a monthly tuition for their services. Tuition is received in the forms of 1) direct payments from parents, and 2) payments on behalf of low-income children through public tuition assistance scholarships, namely County Childcare Assistance Program (CCAP) and Think Small Early Learning Scholarships. MAICC provides daily transportation to and from their home for many children. MAICC also participates in the Child & Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and provides breakfast, lunch and an afternoon snack for all children. MAICC is aware of the importance of family and a stable home environment and as such provides additional programming opportunities to provide a wrap-around approach. Wrap around services include Family Nest and additional parenting engagement activities; Prenatal to Three (P23) programming that offers weekly playgroup, one on one visits, a lending library and a monthly workshop to families with children between birth and age three; Family Coaching and Outreach Connections as a core partner in the Ramsey County Economic Mobility Hub; and more recently a new Dual Training Pathway to support the professional development and increase the number of American Indian early childhood providers. MAICC received funding through various grants to fund our direct care, support services to parents and families and general operating expenses. In FY25, MAICC moved to a new location in August 2024. Renovations to prepare the new locations were completed. Renovations at the new location will allow MAICC to expand. The new space has two rooms for ages 3-6 years old, one room to care for toddlers ages 18 months to 3 years old (currently being used as the Prenatal to Three room), two staff offices, a laundry room, and access to a commercial kitchen. In FY25, a total of forty-six (46) children, ages birth to 6, from thirty-six (36) unduplicated families were provided with care and early learning services and programming. This represents 29 children from 25 families served in the Children's House and 17 families representing 20 children with 25 adults participating in the Prenatal to Three (P23) Program. There were twelve (12) newly enrolled children in the Children's House and seven (7) new families in the past year. The Program Expenses for MAICC are allocated in the following ways: Personnel (63%), Building & Space (7%), Operating Expenses (22%), and Programming (7%) comprised of Activity/Program Costs, which include Classroom Supplies, Food, Transportation, Parent Support, and Family Stabilization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 75.2%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 75.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $779K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.