Montana Vista Fire Rescue Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742519577
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
El Paso, TX, USA
Phone
9158571080
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fire Prevention

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,189
Expenses
$93,040
Assets
$24,414
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALEXIS MARQUEZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ESTEVAN SALCIDO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ALEXIS MARQUEZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ESTEVAN SALCIDO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • VIRGINIA WELLS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is the mission and the vision of Montana vista fire rescue to be responsive to community needs and concerns by limiting the loss of life, injury, and property damage. We will take great risk, in a highly calculated manner, to save those lives that can be saved and to protect salvageable property.

What it reported doing in 2025

It is the mission and the vision of Montana vista fire rescue to be responsive to community needs and concerns by limiting the loss of life, injury, and property damage. We will take great risk, in a highly calculated manner, to save those lives that can be saved and to protect salvageable property. The department's most significant source of support is its operating contract with the el paso county emergency services district no.2 (esd2). This contract allows esd2 to appropriate funds to the department to cover operating costs. Additionally, esd2 may reimburse other operating expenditures such as payments to volunteer firemen and equipment purchases so long as they are made in accordance with exempt purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.