Montana Public Interest Research Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810405836
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Missoula, MT, USA
Phone
4062432908
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$320,380
Expenses
$396,584
Assets
$268,973
Liabilities
$5,649

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEAN MCGOVERN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEAN MCGOVERN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $58,958 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Montana public interest research group (montpirg) is a student directed non-partisan organization dedicated to creating positive change by educating, organizing, mobilizing, and empowering the next generation of civic leaders.

What it reported doing in 2024

Montpirg creates positive, tangible change in Montana montpirg educates and organizes college students through experimental learning and advocacy. We tackle important issues facing Montana including protecting our environment, advancing clean energy, empowering young voters, and defending consumer rights. In 2023-2024, montpirg trained student leaders who worked to protect Montana's water quality by working to ban certain plastics in consumer goods, knocked on thousands of doors to discuss sustainable energy, and registered thousands of people to vote, providing voter information, and getting them out to participate in elections. Voter engagement registering to vote is one of the first steps to becoming civically engaged and accordingly, one of montpirg's most important goals is its yearly voter registration goal. Each semester, our teams work to make access to registering to vote as easy and accessible as possible. Working throughout the missoula and bozeman communities, we help the thousands of young people have access to the vote. By directly linking candidates and causes with students, mobilizing student voter turnout, and equipping young people with the necessary tools and resources to cast their ballots, montpirg facilitated informed participation in the electoral process. Through on-campus informational events, candidate forums, and rallies, we helped college students vote. While local government may seem distant to many people, we recognize that local decision-makers often have the greatest impact on daily lives, making it imperative to connect young and first-time voters with these officials to amplify younger voices in the democratic process. Standing up for the environment in the summer of 2024, montpirg engaged in signature gathering and canvassing efforts to add ballot initiatives to the november 2024 election that would ban certain plastics from the cities of bozeman and missoula. Leadership development at the core of montpirg's mission lies a commitment to experiential learning and leadership development. Recognizing the role young leaders play across society, our primary objective is to empower these individuals with the necessary competencies and knowledge to advocate effectively for themselves and their communities. This year, we conducted intensive training sessions for cohorts of interns in bozeman and missoula, focusing on a diverse range of skills such as fundraising, grassroots organizing (including door knocking and phone calling), written communication (including letter writing), public speaking, event coordination, and peer-to-peer outreach. In addition to our intern program, we actively engage volunteers who collaborate with interns and staff to cultivate these proficiencies and drive meaningful change. Participants gain hands-on experience by addressing issues directly impacting both themselves and their community members, amplifying their impact and enhancing their leadership capabilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 67.6%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84% of revenue deployed · 67.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $268K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $59K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.