Montana Parkinson's Foundation Montana Parkinson's Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461389606
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Billings, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4062566532
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,050
- Expenses
- $6,338
- Assets
- $4,751
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN PATRICK HAGAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN PATRICK HAGAN (PRESIDENT)
- CAROL D HAGAN (VICE PRESIDE)
- DANE A BRADFORD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Montana parkinsons foundation, incs main goal is to raise money to help fund charitable organizations that are involved in parkinsons disease research, specifically those who are searching to find a cure and to develop new medication and treatments for parkinsons patients, as well as to help both caregivers and patients in their daily activities. This will be done through donations, fine art auctions, and events, to help raise funds for our cause. A good portion of these funds raised will go to the michael j. Fox foundation, with the balance being distributed to various parkinsons disease groups throughout Montana and the region. We are trying to help groups who lack the funds necessary, to educate and connect people with resources to better assist them with their daily parkinsons disease needs, in the cities and rural areas of our region.
What it reported doing in 2014
To better serve the community in raising funds for individuals with parkinsons.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -503.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.