Montana Mindfulness Project

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832891383
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Bozeman, MT, USA
Phone
6307808940
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$145,516
Expenses
$98,163
Assets
$127,465
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARGARET KACHADURIAN (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES LOEFFELHOLZ (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARGARET KACHADURIAN (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES LOEFFELHOLZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TAJALI TOLAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We bring mindfulness programs into schools and communities, providing students with tools that foster focused attention, emotional regulation and resilience for a lifetime.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, the Montana mindfulness project provided mindfulness education to more than 1,050 individuals in schools, after-school programs, workplaces, and community settings across the gallatin valley and throughout the state. Over the course of the year, mmp partnered with 24 public schools and community organizationsincluding bozeman health, bozeman school district, united way and Montana state universityto deliver programming across these settings. Our offerings in 2025 included weekly mindfulness education for youth, family and parent mindfulness series, young adult retreats, professional development workshops for parents and caregivers, educators, healthcare staff, and nonprofit employees as well as a free online, weekly mindfulness practice open to the community. Mmp also expanded access through statewide digital curricula developed in partnership with the office of public instruction.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 26
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 32.6%; rating input score 33

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.5%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 32.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.