Montana Landlords Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810484875
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Great Falls, MT, USA
Phone
4065864793
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeowners & Tenants Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$170,916
Expenses
$141,378
Assets
$213,483

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN SINRUD (President)
  • SHARON LODGE (Vice President)
  • ROB SMAUS (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN SINRUD (President)
  • SHARON LODGE (Vice President)
  • ROB SMAUS (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Montana landlords association (mla) was formally incorporated in helena as a statewide, non-profit organization on january 15, 1976, made up of single family, apartment, and mobile home court owners to combine their local efforts into a unified and powerful statewide voice. We are dedicated to the protection of its members' mutual interest in landlords' rights by providing educational, legislative and such other assistance as may be required by its membership.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide members on-going training, education, timely information, and resources to assist them in understanding and applying the laws that govern landlord/tenant relationships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. No material rating questions were generated from the available inputs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.5%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.5% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $110K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.