Monroe Woodbury Teachers Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237365773
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Central Valley, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8454606200
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $658,827
- Expenses
- $675,053
- Assets
- $107,539
- Liabilities
- $54,009
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARRELL MCELROY (PRESIDENT)
- KACEY CAPEN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- JACOB GARDNER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARY A KOLL (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KACEY CAPEN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $12,933 total reported compensation
- DARRELL MCELROY (PRESIDENT): $12,345 total reported compensation
- ERIN ROBINSON (TREASURER): $8,145 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary function of the organization is to work for the welfare of school children, the advancement of education, and the improvement of instructional opportunities for all; to develop and promote the adoption of such ethical practices and standards of preparation and participation; to unify and strengthen the teaching profession and to secure and maintain the salaries, retirement, tenure, professional rights, and other working conditions necessary to support teaching as a profession; to enable members to speak with a common voice on matters pertaining to the teaching profession and to present their individual and common interests before the board of education and other legal authorities; to hold funds and employ a staff, when needed, for the attainment of these purposes.
What it reported doing in 2024
The primary function of the organization is to work for the welfare of school children, the advancement of education, and the improvement of instructional opportunities for all. Revenue to provide services listed in the organization's mission is derived primarily from dues received from the teacher's payroll withholdings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $13K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.