Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510188852
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Rochester, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5857532037
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,824,710
- Expenses
- $1,335,435
- Assets
- $12,816,372
- Liabilities
- $259,159
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HANIF ABDUL-WAHID (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTOPHER JOHNSTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANA LISS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TONY SCIARABBA (CDC MANAGER): $99,609 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The monroe county industrial development corporation (mcidc) fosters economic growth and opportunity by providing access to capital, including microlending, to support small businesses, entrepreneurs, established employers, and not-for-profit organizations. Through strategic investments in workforce development and business expansion, mcidc promotes job creation, retention, and the long-term prosperity of monroe county and the greater rochester region.
What it reported doing in 2025
This microloan program provides loans from $10,000 to $50,000 to help small businesses with most business related costs. The micro advantage loan program provides funds to businesses that may not otherwise be a candidate for traditional bank loans. This loan program gives you the opportunity to secure funding while learning the loan process andbuilding your credit in the process.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 72.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.6; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 26 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.