Monongalia Home Corporation Dba Sundale
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550421569
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Morgantown, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3045990497
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,299,260
- Expenses
- $16,354,250
- Assets
- $5,492,304
- Liabilities
- $6,494,693
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANET WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
- RYAN TRIGG SMITH (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- FAIZAL OYESIGA (LPN): $143,650 total reported compensation
- MISTY GOFF (LPN): $117,459 total reported compensation
- JESSICA SHAFFER (LPN): $115,837 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We seek and nurture the spirit in every resident to succeed and when necessary to adapt to permanent disability, when possible to achieve independence and when appropriate to return home.
What it reported doing in 2025
Monongalia home corporation operates a one-hundred bed intermediate and skilled care nursing home and palliative care unit serving the needs of the greater morgantown area. Monongalia home corporation provides care regardless of financial status.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.6%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 95.3%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.18; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.6% of revenue deployed · 95.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 16 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.