Mongolian Nature's Legacy Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993393094
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Ulaanbaatar, MG
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,832
- Expenses
- $44,796
- Assets
- $53,565
- Liabilities
- $49
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NOMINDARI ENKHTUR (CEO)
People named in this filing
- URANTSOOJ GOMBOSUREN (BOARD MEMBER)
- AZJARGAL ULZIITOGTOKH (BOARD MEMBER)
- AMGALANBAATAR SUKH (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The company is organized and operated for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes within the meaning of sections 501(c)(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(vi) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "code"). The company may undertake only charitable, educational, and scientific activities that provide funding and other forms of support for conservation and climate change adaptation activities in mongolia as identified and prioritized by relevant stakeholders including without limitation the government of mongolia (the "government"), plus such other activities as may align with the achievement of conservation commitments of mongolia arising from or related to transactions associated with the formation of the company, and activities designed to help the people of mongolia steward a sustainable future for the inhabitants and environment of the country of mongolia (the company's "general purpose").
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide funding and other forms of support for environmental and biodiversity protection, conservation, and community-based natural resources management projects in mongolia that align with the achievement of conservation commitments in mongolia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.