Monday Morning Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237192329
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Riverside, CA, USA
Phone
9516766555
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$126,869
Expenses
$88,547
Assets
$175,561
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CINDY ROTH (PRESIDENT)
  • LOU MONVILLE (1ST- VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SEAN VARNER (2ND-VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CINDY ROTH (PRESIDENT)
  • LOU MONVILLE (1ST- VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SEAN VARNER (2ND-VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This is a group of proven community leaders dedicated to the social and economic well being of western riverside county and its environs, through informed, collective and individual influence and actions. Working largely from the private sector, the monday morning group has built an essential advocacy structure of concerned citizens that is proactive, informed and effective - on that works and delivers results.

What it reported doing in 2024

Advocate for the two western riverside community college district differential funding for program-based enrollments. As well as advocate for the university of California, riverside.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.2%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.