Monarchcare Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
651059938
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Pompano Beach, FL, USA
Phone
9547202485
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$277,111
Expenses
$294,522
Assets
$166,390
Liabilities
$50,578

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT MEDOFF (PRES./CEO/DI)
  • KELLY WILSON (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SCOTT MEDOFF (PRES./CEO/DI): $66,579 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Monarchcare is a social service agency providing direct client services, information, and resources for the care and support of the frail, elderly, disabled, or at-risk populations of south Florida.

What it reported doing in 2024

Monarchcare provides quality care management, guardianship and personalized financial services to at-risk individuals across south Florida regardless of the clients' ability to pay. Clients range from minor children to the frail elderly, from mentally ill youths to adults with developmental disabilities. Challenges faced by our clients include: -inability to manage daily needs due to decline in physical health or cognitive functioning, and/or multiple medical issues. -easily confused, vulnerable, and at-risk for abuse, exploitation and/or self-neglect. -difficulty navigating the complex healthcare system. Monarchcare is recognized as a leader in filling the gaps in services for south Florida's vulnerable citizens. Over the years, monarchcare has rescued susceptible individuals from financial exploitation, restored institutionalized persons to independent lifestyles and reconnected isolated persons with long lost family and friends. In fiscal year 2024- 2025, monarchcare served over 45 clients, providing intensive case management, personalized financial and guardianship services. Monarchcare programs and services ensure our clients have a stable and supportive lifestyle within the least restrictive environment. Monarchcare serves some clients for a lifetime. We have three inter-related programs that provide direct services to clients and a fourth service offering community education. Our care management program provided over 2,200 hours of intense care management to at-risk individuals, including persons who are legally incapacitated. Our care managers provided regular client visits at their homes, facilities and doctor's offices to ensure that program participants received all needed services along with dignified and compassionate treatment from other service providers. Individuals who benefit from care management live alone, have no family or support system nearby, have multiple medical issues, poor nutrition, or are easily influenced or confused. This year we provided over 1,200 hours of guardianship services to incapacitated individuals, many of whom also receive our care management services. If an individual is legally incapacitated, has no advance directives, and is non-compliant with the necessary assistance to provide for their well-being, then guardianship may be the only alternative to keep him or her safe. Because guardianship removes a person's rights, it is used only as a last resort, to protect the most vulnerable of individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 78
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.8%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 63.8%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.8% of revenue deployed · 63.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $188K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $67K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.