Monadnock Community Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020222157
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Peterborough, NH, USA
Phone
6039247191
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$137,169,599
Expenses
$131,722,856
Assets
$205,381,952
Liabilities
$48,525,347

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cynthia McGuire (Chief Executive Officer)

Highest reported compensation

  • Vache Hambardzumyan MD (Physician): $629,871 total reported compensation
  • Terrence McNamara DO (Trustee/Physician): $560,336 total reported compensation
  • Brian Kwitkin MD (Physician): $556,472 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

What it reported doing in 2024

The primary purpose of Monadnock Community Hospital (MCH) is to ensure access to quality health care for patients in our community, regardless of their ability to pay. The following is a summary of the services MCH provides in an effort to fulfill its mission, together with key program statistics for fiscal year 2025.Inpatient Services - Includes: adult stays, maternity/births, and swing bed nursing. During the fiscal year, the Hospital admitted 1,079 patients and recorded 3,102 patient days. Emergency Services - MCH offers health services 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Responsible for the immediate treatment of any medical or surgical emergency; for initiating life saving procedures in all types of emergency situations; and for providing emergency and initial evaluations and treatment for other conditions including minor illnesses and injuries, and sub-acute medical problems. During the year, there were 13,676 visits to the ER. Physician Practices - Family health services, programs, and education are integral components of healthcare at MCH. Inpatient and outpatient primary care includes: medical, surgical, psychological and specialist services, provided by physicians and mid-level practitioners. These are located at the Hospital and its four satellite practices located in Antrim, Jaffrey, New Ipswich, and Rindge. During the year, 58,412 primary care office visits were recorded. Surgical Services - Includes same day and short-term inpatient surgery. MCH provides surgery in the areas of orthopaedics, general surgery, OB/GYN, ophthalmology, urology, ENT, and podiatry. In addition, the Hospital offers some non-surgical procedures including colonoscopies, gastroscopies, and pain management injections. During the fiscal year, 4,386 procedures were performed. Radiology and Diagnostics - MCH provides advanced radiological technology and extensive imaging services including: bone density, MRI, CT, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, mammography, and other diagnostic procedures, both inpatient and outpatient. During the fiscal year, 37,106 exams were performed. Rehabilitation Services - Additionally, MCH serves the people of the Monadnock Region through its medical rehabilitation and fitness services. MCH offers rehabilitation programs for cardiac and diabetic rehabilitation, along with pulmonary fitness, which feature educational and exercise components. We also provide physical and occupational therapy, as well as speech rehabilitation. During the fiscal year, 76,647 procedures were recorded for these services. Monadnock Community Hospital's Financial Grant Program provides assistance with hospital and/or physician bills for qualifying patients. In fiscal year 2025, the Organization recorded $1,037,000 in charges foregone based on established rates. In addition, Monadnock Community Hospital provided other services to the community at no cost or reduced cost, such as screenings and clinics. The cost of providing these services was approximately $20,623,000 in fiscal year 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 89%; rating input score 89; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 89.5%; rating input score 89; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $116.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $630K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.8M reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 42 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 12 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.