Monache High School Gridiron Boosters

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
451546982
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Porterville, CA, USA
Phone
5593106733
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$33,842
Expenses
$26,069
Assets
$11,841

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BLANCA CARAVEO (President)
  • KIM WEIMER (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • BLANCA CARAVEO (President)
  • KIM WEIMER (Vice President)
  • VERONICA GARCIA (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide support and encouragement of the athletic, academic and personal achievements of the members of the monache high school football team. This will be done by volunterring time, contributing financial backing, fundraising for hte success of the team to imporve and advance the quality of the football program as a whole.

What it reported doing in 2017

Merchadise sales - we purchase t-shirts, sweaters, hats, stadium chairs & legs, kuzzies, towels, tank tops, auto flags & decals with our logo and sell them at a mark-up. We have one (1) or two (2) drive-thru dinners a year with the football players selling tickets for the dinner. We cook tri-tip, beans and add salad (from smart & final), salad dressing, roll, butter and cookie (purchased from el diamante high school-visalia, ca). We sponsor a golf tournamentin the spring/summer and solicit tee sponsors, enntry fees and donation give away.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.