Mohair Council of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751246306
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Angelo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3256553161
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $89,483
- Expenses
- $105,883
- Assets
- $215,076
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARLON STAPPER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CARLON STAPPER (PRESIDENT)
- BONNIE NAUMANN (VP)
- TOMMY HEAD (SEC/TREAS)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See additional information.
What it reported doing in 2024
Primary exempt purpose: *to promote the general welfare of the mohair industry. *to promote the production of and continuous improvement in quality of mohair.*to develop and conduct an educational, promotional and public relations program, utilizing all available media, such program to be designed to acquaint the public generally, with the excellent, unmatched qualities and unique characteristics of mohair and the importance of its use in the manufacture of mohair products.*to undertake extensive and continuous scientific and marketing research with the view of developing new methods to improve the mohair products and of discovering and promoting new uses for mohair; and to disseminate all of such information throughout the industry.*to foster close cooperation and harmonious working relations and alliances among wool and mohair organizations connected with all segments of the industry.*to take any other steps deemed necessary to increase the usage and price of mohair thereby assisting in the producers viability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.03; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 31 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.