Modern Divorce a Nj Nonprofit Corporatio Fka Collaborative Divorce Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464069740
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fair Lawn, NJ, USA
Phone
2017911560
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,345
Expenses
$18,111
Assets
$5,513
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEGAN A SARTOR CPAABVCFF (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • SHIREEN B MEISTRICH LCSW (CO-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MEGAN A SARTOR CPAABVCFF (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • SHIREEN B MEISTRICH LCSW (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • ALEXANDRA M COGLIANESE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's activities consist of being a membership organization for those in the practice areas of law, accounting, or mental health who encourage and promote the use and practice of collaborative law as a non-adversarial structured alternative to going to court.

What it reported doing in 2025

Activites conducted by the organization's members consist of helping divorcing couples and families transition through a difficult and emotional time by offering support. Members assist and help families to create new positive ways of interaction and advise how to best preserve family relationships with the main focus being the long-term well-being of all family members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -117%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -16.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.