Mobility Is Freedom Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933100767
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Towson, MD, USA
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Medical Research N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,050
Expenses
$11,211
Assets
$200,236

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Charles Dankmeyer Jr (President)

People named in this filing

  • Charles Dankmeyer Jr (President)
  • Thomas F Fise (Vice Presidnet)
  • Kenton Kaufman (Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

MiFFis a charity under 509a2 providing grants and scholarships on inter-disciplinary care for amputees.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Mobility is Freedom Foundation MiFF is proud to announce the first MiFF PhD Scholar Award recipient Emily Dinelli at Northwestern University. This prestigious award includes a total commitment of $50,000 disbursed in three installments. The initial installment of $25,000 was paid directly to Northwestern University in July 2024 The second installment payment of $7,500 was paid in February 2025 supporting Emily Dinellis academic pursuits in the field of mobility research. This award underscores MiFFs dedication to fostering education and innovation in the realm of mobility for deserving scholars like Emily Dinelli. A second MiFF PhD Scholar Award recipient Ms. Cynthia Chude of Meharry Medical College and Wharton School Univ. of Penn was announced in 2025 with a $50,000 total commitment and the first installment of $15,000 was paid in January 2026.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 66.9%; rating input score 67

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67.1%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.86; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -86.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 66.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.