Mobile Member Care Team
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 980365458
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Midlothian, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8047488045
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,898
- Expenses
- $177,982
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- Darlene Jerome (International Coordinator)
- Karen F Carr (CFO Clinical Director)
- Jackie Buhler (Board Chair)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We’re former members of MMCT, the Mobile Member Care Team. Our aim is to facilitate the sharing of ideas and resources among member care providers from various missions in order to strengthen the global mission.
What it reported doing in 2017
Library Resources available to cross-cultural workers. Hundreds of library books distributed to missonaries in West Africa.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 4
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.9%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 12
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -256.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 44.9% of revenue deployed · 12.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.