Mobile Medical Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237022588
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Rockville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3014932400
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,720,153
- Expenses
- $6,904,552
- Assets
- $2,549,759
- Liabilities
- $643,195
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Wendy Frosh (President)
- Ivonne Rodriguez Santiago (Vice President)
- Wendy Krasner (Immediate Past President)
- Peter Lowet (Executive Director (until 10/4/2024))
Highest reported compensation
- Charlotte Jenkins Interim ED ((from 10/4/2024); ED (from 2/1/2025)): $178,860 total reported compensation
- Peter Lowet (Executive Director (until 10/4/2024)): $161,711 total reported compensation
- Mistre Ayele (Nurse): $151,204 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of low-income people who face the greatest barriers to care access. Our values include healthcare access for all; quality services provided with compassion; respect and cultural sensitivity; and organizational excellence and integrity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Vans/other clinics: the organization provides primary and preventive care to low-income, uninsured residents of Montgomery County, Maryland at little or no charge, as well as to Medicaid and low-income Medicare enrollees. The program is designed to provide quality healthcare to all residents age 18 and over who face significant financial and other access barriers. Patients are seen regardless of their ability to pay. The majority of patients are between 30 and 65 years of age. Clinics are conducted at various locations - at fixed sites (Briggs Chaney, Rockville) and in mobile medical vans (Aspen Hill, Gaithersburg) - at scheduled times during each week. The clinics are staffed primarily by paid nurse practitioners, nurses, therapists, support personnel, and volunteer physicians. Services are delivered (continued on Schedule O) via in-person and telehealth appointments. Patients can also use some walk-in slots to ensure accessibility. The Organization continues to recruit volunteers for both professional and support staff positions to assist in the delivery of services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.8%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 99; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.7%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.8% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $179K · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.