Moab Area Chamber of Commerce

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
870462372
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Moab, UT, USA
Phone
4352597814
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$134,644
Expenses
$205,763
Assets
$90,537
Liabilities
$1,877

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEY KORENBLAT (PRESIDENT)
  • JOLENE STONE (PRESIDENT, F)

People named in this filing

  • CORA PHILLIPS (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • ASHLEY KORENBLAT (PRESIDENT)
  • JOLENE STONE (PRESIDENT, F)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Engage, empower, and educate business for greater success. The moab chamber of commerce represents and serves businesses and professionals seeking to grow our local economy and improve business climate while maintaining quality of life and fostering cooperation with business, government, and community.

What it reported doing in 2025

The purpose of the moab chamber of commerce is: to provide information, keeping members informed about current events, local activities, and business issues. To help by providing programs and services to help our businesses succeed. To provide a forum for networking with other businesses. To promote and improve the local economy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -52.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 47%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.