Mo-1 Dmat
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753157337
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3142816141
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $999,426
- Expenses
- $1,032,006
- Assets
- $70,030
- Liabilities
- $48,245
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GEORGE MARK THORP (PRESIDENT & COMMANDER)
Highest reported compensation
- KEVIN TWEEDY (VP & DEPUTY COMMANDER): $96,366 total reported compensation
- GEORGE MARK THORP (PRESIDENT & COMMANDER): $65,945 total reported compensation
- AUSTIN WORCESTER (SECRETARY/TREASURER & CFO/MRC BRANCH LEAD): $28,846 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide disaster medical services on an as-requested basis throughout the state of Missouri
What it reported doing in 2014
Expenses incurred for disaster medical response team
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 19
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 16.7%; rating input score 17; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -28.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.1% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $916K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 17/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.