Mn Catholic Youth Partnership
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883577111
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Long Lake, MN, USA
- Phone
- 8045395421
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Roman Catholic
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,831,386
- Expenses
- $2,528,714
- Assets
- $6,851,230
- Liabilities
- $2,489,706
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
People named in this filing
- HELEN HEALY (DIRECTOR)
- RYAN WILSON (DIRECTOR)
- PETE LARSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To proclaim christ to all peoples. Our goal is to create a safe, fun, supportive environment where young people can have a life-changing encounter with jesus. During the summer, we will offer young people a best-in-class faith camp experience. The rest of the year, the camp will benefit the archdiocese of minneapolis-st. Paul with a large, well-equipped facility to host retreats and science camps for youth and adults.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization has established a religious camp for adults and youth
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 30
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.1%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 62.4%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 56.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.71; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 148.2% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 116.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 121.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.1% of revenue deployed · 62.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.