Mmlj Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770558977
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Bakersfield, CA, USA
Phone
6615897088
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Employment Procurement Assistance
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$56,128
Expenses
$54,557
Assets
$3,948

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT H JOHNSON (President)

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT H JOHNSON (President)
  • JEFF JOHNSON (Director)
  • DONALD E FRIESEN (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To teach, preach, train and educate people everywhere in the gospel of our lord and savior jesus christ. Our efforts will supply and render services of a charitable and spiritual nature to poor and needy persons in the united states or elsewhere with a special emphasis on children.

What it reported doing in 2015

We minister to the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of the hopeless with a primary interest in children. We provided basic medical help through professionals, showers, clothing, employment assistance, training for mothers, meals, and connected people with persons that could provide immediate and ongoing assistance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 59% for direct work, and 41% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.2%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.2% of revenue deployed · 2.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.