Mitchell Street Arts Collaborative Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880703665
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Milwaukee, WI, USA
Phone
8479977792
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$151,620
Expenses
$167,409
Assets
$70,100
Liabilities
$51,789

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA WOLF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAELA MURRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • LYSSA OLKER (PRESIDENT)
  • SHAMPAYNE SIFUENTES (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SAMANTHA WOLF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAELA MURRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • HANNA MOORE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mitchell street arts collaborative mission is to promote cross-cultural connection and equitable development.

What it reported doing in 2025

Gallery program - the gallery program presents public art exhibitions that spotlight the creativity of local artists. Each show features work rooted in the stories, identities, and perspectives of our community. By offering an accessible platform for emerging and established artists, the program strengthens local cultural expression. All exhibitions are free and open to the public, inviting everyone to engage with the arts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.9%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 46.1%; rating input score 46

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 34.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.9% of revenue deployed · 46.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $77K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.