Mister Mac Behavioral Consultants Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800275097
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Lake City, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3866281606
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $593,370
- Expenses
- $587,978
- Assets
- $165,006
- Liabilities
- $953,565
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANTHONY J BUZZELLA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & PRINC)
- RALPH PETER MAZZOCCHI (PRESIDENT)
- MAURICE EVANS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANTHONY J BUZZELLA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & PRINC): $57,200 total reported compensation
- ABIGAIL R BUZZELLA (TREASURER & DIRECTOR OF OP): $5,250 total reported compensation
- ROSE E EVANS (SECRETARY & TEACHER): $4,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a nurturing environment that inspires, challenges, and motivates artistically gifted students to achieve success in academic, social, and career preparation.
What it reported doing in 2024
North Florida arts & sciences academy is organized for the purpose of providing a rigorous academic curriculum that stresses english language proficiency and leads to high levels of student achievement especially in the area of fine arts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 5.78; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $564K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $57K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.