Missourians for Compassionate Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465274550
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Perryville, MO, USA
Phone
3143939757
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$350,049
Expenses
$382,291
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK HABBAS (President)
  • CHARLES SMARR (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • MARK HABBAS (President)
  • STEVEN TILLEY (Secretary/Treas)
  • CHARLES SMARR (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization has the purpose of supporting legislation that would make lawful the use of hemp for commercial purposes and medical marijuana for the treatment of illnesses, diseases and health conditions subject to appropriate state regulation and oversight.

What it reported doing in 2016

We started Missourians for Compassionate Care because we believe patients and physicians deserve to have options for medical treatments of illnesses that have been shown to benefit from medical marijuana. We started Missourians for Compassionate Care after we lobbied the CBD Oil bill last year in MO for a friend who has a child with Intractable Epilepsy. We sought help from Paige Figi from Realm of Caring, a not-for profit that provided us with the education and how to lobby for CBD Oil for children with Intractable Epilepsy. We all lobbied the Bill Pro Bono because we believed in giving families an option when other medications and treatments were not working. We were successful lobbying the bill and got it passed through the legislature and signed by the Governor of MO. After hearing from families in the state of Missouri that they would like to have the option of using cannabis for certain illnesses, we decided to seek financial help from individuals who were compassionate enough to help expand the use of cannabis for certain debilitating Illnesses. Every contributor to the effort to legalize medical cannabis was told up front that there are no guarantees that we can pass a bill and there are no guarantees that we can offer or even help with Medical Marijuana licenses in the future. Everyone who donated money to the medical cannabis effort was told that the money they donate would only be used for legal, consulting, lobbying and educational purposes. Having lobbied issues before, we knew that it would be difficult to try and pass a medical marijuana bill through the Missouri General Assembly, especially after seeing how the CBD Oil lobbying efforts went. We figured a budget that would help us hire Lobbyist to work on this issue full time because we knew how important it is for patients and families who suffer from certain debilitating medical conditions to get this bill passed as soon as possible. Our goal is to engage in a lobbying effort, public relations and educational campaign directed towards lawmakers, media outlets and the general public regarding the benefits of medical marijuana and ultimately move toward legalization in the state of Missouri. Our priority is to pass a bill by lobbying the Missouri Lawmakers and getting the bill to the Governors desk. The project officially started in September of 2014. The lobbying for medical marijuana started in January of 2015. The effort failed last year so we continued educating lawmakers during the off session period. The effort to lobby a medical marijuana bill for legalization in Missouri continued in January of 2016. We have put together a smaller lobbying team to work on passing this bill this year because our budget is smaller than what we received last year. The lobbying effort this past session fell short as it did last year. The Missouri legislative session ended on May 13, 2016. The issue of medical marijuana did not receive the necessary support to get the Bill passed out of the General Assembly. The lobbying and educational effort was carried out by a team of lobbyists that are registered to Lobby for Missourians for Compassionate Care under the rules by the Missouri Ethics Commission. There was also lobbying done by families and patients who suffer from numerous debilitating illnesses who want the option of using medical cannabis recommended by their physician.This will be the final year that we Lobby medical marijuana under Missourians for Compassionate Care because the measure is going to be placed on the November Ballot for voters in Missouri to decide.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $380K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.