Missouri Tire Dealers & Retreaders Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431140087
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Jefferson City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5736162065
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,053
- Expenses
- $44,385
- Assets
- $182,337
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATT JOST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RYAN SCHROEDER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MATT JOST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MIKE DIEHM (DIRECTOR)
- MARTY CAMPBELL (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of mtia is to safeguard the interests of Missouri's tire industry, to educate and maintain among its members a high standard of professionalism and integrity, to cultivate a spirit of fraternal cooperation among its members, to promote local organization of tire industry professionals throughout Missouri, and to promote and establish an understanding between the tire industry and the general pubic throughout the state of Missouri.
What it reported doing in 2024
A variety of benefits are provided to its members including discounted checks and credit card programs, uniform programs and access to technical training materials.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.11; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $44K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.