Missouri Humanities Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431103937
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3143718788
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Humanities Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,986,857
- Expenses
- $4,756,571
- Assets
- $5,959,306
- Liabilities
- $298,695
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ASHLEY BEARD-FOSNOW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ASHLEY BEARD-FOSNOW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $97,023 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Missouri humanities is a state-wide nonprofit that explores history, civics, and culture through community partnerships and public programming.
What it reported doing in 2024
Missouri humanities offered 197 live and asynchronous council-conducted programs in 2025. Subrecipient-conducted activities took place with 443,079 participants. 506,046 total missourians were served throughout the year. Grantsmajor grants are awarded to humanities-based proposals twice yearly for up to $15,000. Mini grants are offered to nonprofit organizations for projects of up to $5,000. In fy25, mh distributed a total of $1,510,287 in grants. 90 grant-funded programs were held in fy25, serving 404,667 people.ideas that shape our society.signature serieswe promote public dialogue through scholarly lectures, symposia, interpretive exhibits, and interactive events. Our signature series in 2025 was Missouri voices: civics and citizenry. We explored individual and collective roles in civic engagement and democratic participation as we examine the bold "american experiment" of a government run by and for the people, a vision rooted in the constitution of the united states. 4,153 individuals joined us in person for 9 tent-pole signature series programs. Missouri humanities also produced 5 episodes of the Missouri voices podcast, which was downloaded 520 times. Missouri humanities produced the documentary not in our wildest dreams", which had 918 views.cultural heritageour heritage programs promote Missouri's rich cultural heritage and historical significance. We offered 25 unique programs, including scholar panels, cultural heritage workshops, and traveling exhibits. We also hosted in-person and virtual capacity-building workshops for cultural institutions across the state, reaching an average of 83 attendees per workshop.veterans programsto amplify veteran voices and experiences, mh hosted two veterans writing workshops, co-published proud to be: writings by american warriors, volume 13, and presented a proud to be reading and roundtable. Through these programs, we engaged 52 veterans, military-connected family members, and civilians.digital programmingmissouri humanities proudly offers multiple ways to engage with humanities-based content from the comfort of your home or on the go. From films, video series, podcasts, and recorded programs, tune in to experience a variety of stories about people, places, and ideas rooted in the humanities. In fy25, we experienced 57,992 video views with 2,136 hours watched. 3,349 podcasts were downloaded. Our podcasts help us reach more people by providing high-quality, engaging stories that listeners can enjoy anywhere, anytime. Each year, we produce new episodes of our Missouri humanities signature series podcast and the small town showcase podcast. In 2025, we produced 6 more small town showcase episodes and 5 signature series episodes. In total, our podcasts received 3,349 downloads. Our youtube channel received 36,693 views, 1,669 hours of viewership, and 5,146 subscribers. In small town showcase, we strive to highlight the uniqueness of rural Missouri and to showcase the bigger picture of what small-town america really is and why it shouldn't be overlooked, overshadowed, or underappreciated. Each year, communities with populations under 10,000 are nominated and voted on by missourians to become our annual "featured five" communities, who then work with us throughout the year to produce a podcast episode and short film about their town. In 2025, our featured five were elsberry, ste. Genevieve, potosi, prairie home, and tarkio. H-tv is Missouri humanities' streaming platform's curated collection of films, docu-series, and other digital storytelling projects to connect viewers with stories, people, and places rooted in the humanities. Content on h-tv includes projects produced by Missouri humanities, like small town showcase and short documentary films, as well as content from other creators who strive to share stories through film. We ended the year with 21,398 users.literary programsmore than 1,697 people participated in our third annual heartland book festival, presented in partnership wi
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 87.2%; rating input score 87; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -59.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 80 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.