Missouri Gamma Alumni Corporation of Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

8 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Member housing

To provide and maintain housing for 50+ students andmembers of fraternity

Revenue model: Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 95.9%; rating input score 96; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.4; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.