Missouri Electrical Compliance Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464752249
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3146212626
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$500
Expenses
$484
Assets
$120
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN KAHRHOFF (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN KAHRHOFF (PRESIDENT)
  • LEAMON W ASHER (SECRETARY)
  • CHARLES E DEMOULIN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promoting social welfare within the meaning of section 501(c)(4) for:1. Monitoring compliance with local, state and federal wage laws including prevailing wage laws.2. Assisting public and private organizations who seek to encourage compliance with wage laws including prevailing wage laws.3. Promoting prevailing wage laws as a matter of social and economic justice, as stabilizing wage rates and protecting the standard of living, and as increasing the purchase power of wage earners.4. Educating the public about local, state and federal wage laws, including prevailing wage laws, and training public leaders in identifying prevailing wage issues.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization has been at the forefront of prevailing wage issues and have successfully defended the issues of economic justice while protecting the standard of living.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.