Missouri Council For Affordable Rental Housing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431363767
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Liberty, MO, USA
Phone
8166794581
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,478
Expenses
$107,386
Assets
$1,013

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sheila Calvert (President)

People named in this filing

  • Sonja Bennett (Executive Dir.)
  • Sheila Calvert (President)
  • Michele Young (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Missouri Council for Affordable Rental Housing, MOCARH, is a non-profit trade organization dedicated to supporting the overall health and viability of affordable rental housing options to support the needs of local communities. Members include property owners, developers, management companies, site managers, non-profits, syndicators, accountants and companies that supply goods and services to the industry. MOCARH provides education and training on government rules, regulations, resources and processes, in addition to significant discounts on products and services vital to the operation, management and maintenance of rental properties. Our goal is to help property owners, property management companies, site managers and site maintenance managers connect, communicate and share ideas to maximize resources, streamline operations, improve occupancy and serve their local communities with affordable housing solutions.

What it reported doing in 2025

Training was provided for affordable housing owner/managers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.