Missouri Chapter of American College of Physicians
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431332364
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Jefferson City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5736362144
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $178,626
- Expenses
- $156,908
- Assets
- $474,628
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JACQUELINE FAIRCHILD MD FACP (President)
People named in this filing
- ABIGAIL EMERSON MD (Director)
- JACQUELINE FAIRCHILD MD FACP (President)
- JOSHUA FERNELIUS MD (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance the quality & effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence & professionalism in the practice of medicine. Acp served approximately 2,500 members for the year.
What it reported doing in 2025
Awards - the acp clerkship award honors medical students who have recently completed the third year of training and who performed meritoriously in their junior year clinical clerkships general internal medicine. The acp excellence in physical diagnosis award recognizes outstanding second year students based on their performance in physical diagnosis class. The acp book award is given to winning students to cover some of the costs for college textbooks. The internal medicine interest group stipend is given to schools in order to provide funding and learning opportunities to support their interest in internal medicine.our chapter provides awards to members based on submissions received from members and non-members. These awards include the laureate award, early career physician award, volunteerism award, master teach award, and a leadership award.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.4%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 55.2%; rating input score 55
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.2%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.4% of revenue deployed · 55.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 9 filed program accomplishments · $87K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.