Missouri Center for Nursing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473909690
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Jefferson City, MO, USA
Phone
5736940180
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nursing Services (General)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$126,155
Expenses
$165,050
Assets
$60,271

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISTINE STRONG (President)

People named in this filing

  • ALISON WILLIAMS (Director)
  • DARRELL MANTLE (Director)
  • STACY FARR (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Missouri center for nursing provides opportunities for collaboration among nursing and health stakeholders to advance a culture of health for all missourians.

What it reported doing in 2018

The direct care nurses leadership academy builds direct care nursing leadership skills and knowledge through a content-rich, interactive mentor-ship program related to applying leadership knowledge and skills to change processes in the workplace environment; planning and implementing an improvement change utilizing project management techniques and methods; and creating confidence and empowering direct care nurses to lead at the point of care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 59.6%; rating input score 60

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 38.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -47.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -56.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 59.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.