Missouri Baptist Healthcare Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431472026
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3149965000
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,295,137
- Expenses
- $12,593,178
- Assets
- $74,451,804
- Liabilities
- $11,174,198
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ABAD ANN (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ABAD ANN (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR): $897,381 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Missouri baptist healthcare foundation is the fund development organization for Missouri baptist medical center (mbmc). The foundation identifies, cultivates, solicits, and communicates with donors to support programs, equipment purchases, and projects for the charitable activities of mbmc and related exempt organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community service/outreach, general operations, research, scholarships. Intensive care unit skills days, continuing education for physical and occupational therapists, and pharmacists. Nicu support for families going home. The foundation provided funds to several mission-related nonprofits in the st. Louis area providing grief support, career leadership programing for youth, community wellness initiatives. This included funds supporting housing for patients, mamography screening, transportation and educational programing. Financial assistance and transportation for the underserved and medical screenings. Nicu family support, including grieving families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.91; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $897K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 45 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.