Missouri Association of School Personnel Administrators
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611618144
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Lake Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 6363853978
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $131,881
- Expenses
- $133,933
- Assets
- $165,430
- Liabilities
- $800
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID CARLSON (PRESIDENT)
- SANDY WILEY (PRESIDENT-EL)
People named in this filing
- PATTY CORUM (FORMER EX. D)
- AMY JOYCE (EXECUTIVE DI)
- DAVID CARLSON (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of moaspa is to promote and support members in various aspects of human resource operations within pk-12 education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Missouri association of school personnel administrators serves human resources professionals and other educators who conduct personnel operations in their schools and districts throughout the state of Missouri. As of june 2025, we had approximately 175 members who we serve through regional meetings, online support, one state conference and ongoing communication regarding updates related to personnel leadership in education in the state of Missouri.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.5% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.