Missouri Assoc of Meat Processors

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
436047819
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Trimble, MO, USA
Phone
8164792935
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,158
Expenses
$148,767
Assets
$371,534
Liabilities
$55,151

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRAD MCCORD (PRESIDENT)
  • DENISE ESSNER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • COLE MERCILLE (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • VERONICA N CLOUD (EXECUTIVE SECRETARY)
  • CONRAD CARPENTER (SUPPLIER DIRECTOR)
  • BRAD MCCORD (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Missouri association of meat processors was founded in 1939, by a small group of meat business operators who were looking for a way to promote their products and businesses. Mamp helps members expand into new markets and learn new skills. Its dual mission of protection and education for members are enhanced by unique marketing opportunities available through the association. Mamp provides 10 newsletters a year and provides training to keep the small processor ahead of the trends.mamp strives to be an open forum, bringing processors, academia, and suppliers together, to keep members on the leading edge od industry trends. Mamp also shares information, provides education, monitors current legislation, and promotes wholesome products throughout the meat industry and all allied services.

What it reported doing in 2025

Supplier information: mamp membership is open to suppliers to the meat industry who readily provide information and advice on products, services, and resources that can be helpful to operators seeking assistance.state meat products championship: mamp members compete annually in Missouri's largest competition for cured and processed meats. The competition is judged by top meat experts and scientists. Missouri conservation federation: membership in the Missouri conservation federation gives you representation on the local, state, and national level. With this membership you will receive two free issues per year of the Missouri wildlife magazine.deer procecssing hints: mamp works with the department of conservation concerning changes in regulations.haccp information: mamp is a distributor of usda haccp information.university of Missouri - columbia: mamp members gain access to advice and services on product development and analysis including workshops, technical assistance, testing of products, etc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.4%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 60.4%; rating input score 60

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -48.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.5; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.9%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.4% of revenue deployed · 60.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $90K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.