Missouri Amateur Ice Hockey
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431588071
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3144464650
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Winter Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $493,918
- Expenses
- $446,587
- Assets
- $386,207
- Liabilities
- $5,282
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE JORDON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JULIE JORDON (PRESIDENT)
- BILL BAKER (VICE PRESIDE)
- ROD FAHS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hockey, at all levels of play. This includes education in the playing skills of ice hockey for the benefits of health and welfare of individual players and the community, including such advanced programs that possibly may assist individual players in furthering their college education by scholarship aid. The association also promotes inclusion, diversity, and acceptance of all backgrounds and skill levels.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Missouri amateur ice hockey association is a local affiliate of USA hockey. The association organized over 2,400 league games with paid referees for approximately 180 teams and sponsored the year end tournament. They also conduct clinics to train amateur coaches, safe sport programs to educate parents & spectators, and support inclusive programs for players of all genders and disabilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 97.5%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.1% of revenue deployed · 97.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $435K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.