Missoula Midtown Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 711030996
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Missoula, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4063708816
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,949
- Expenses
- $93,302
- Assets
- $64,963
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tyrell McPherson (President)
- Timothy Winger (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Melanie Brock (Executive Dir.)
- Lauren Hutchison (Director)
- Tyrell McPherson (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Missoula Midtown Association is dedicated to the promotion, enhancement, and accessibility of the midtown area as it relates to businesses, residents, and the community. Its goals are to provide resources and information related to the success and growth of a healthy business community, and to enhance the quality of life and quality of place for visitors and residents alike.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Missoula Midtown Association is dedicated to the promotion, enhancement, and accessibility of the midtown area as it relates to businesses, residents, and the community. Its goals are to provide resources and information related to the success and growth of a healthy business community, and to enhance the quality of life and quality of place for visitors and residents alike. Recent accomplishments include leading the city in a Master Plan effort to guide the redevelopment of the aging commercial district and increasing housing density amidst Montana's affordable housing crisis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.8%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 66.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -123.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -61.6% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -60.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.